Makeup and Identity names a paradox: makeup inscribes social norms while it authors personal narratives. Does it construct our persona by masking our presence?

Our face is the epicenter of the body, and the aesthetic transformation of it through makeup stands among humanity’s oldest cultural practices. Yet makeup still faces moral scrutiny: it is cast as the opposite of nature, health, purity, and truth. Critics insist that artifice must mimic the natural, a demand that paradoxically denies the very image makeup creates. The portrait is erased as it is painted.

Today, this tension plays out most sharply in gendered norms: those coded as female deploy color freely, while others navigate a tighter script of acceptability. At the same time, every brushstroke becomes an act of aesthetic self-justification, a declaration of identity crafted in pigment and powder. Simultaneously banner and shield, it balances distinction with conformity, granting wearers both voice and mask. And at the mirror’s edge, perception and performance merge in a continuous loop, co-authoring the identities we inhabit.

Grounded in Heiner Keupp’s concept of patchwork identity and Nina Degele’s ideology of privacy, this research argues that makeup is far more than surface decoration. It is a charged visual language – a dynamic interplay of concealment and revelation – that constructs the very notion of self in our fragmented, role-driven lives. Makeup is never neutral: it conceals and reveals. In the collision of these forces, makeup does more than embellish – it constructs the identities we inhabit.

The full paper is available in German upon request.

error: